The Scarlet Alliance/Sex Worker Collective’s Misogyny. Why They Should Not Be funded.

I have appropriated the pimp lobby’s red umbrella to fight for the Nordic Model.

Perhaps everyone who actually cares about women in prostitution can use this as a profile pic- although, I realise my creation is not very pretty. I have no sympathy for the Scarlet Alliance and the whole red umbrella collective crying how oppressed and stigmatised they are.  They never helped me, and as evidenced below, they never will help anyone trying to leave the industry. Too much money to be made trading in human beings. They are among the scum of the earth and treat prostituted women like shit. But don’t take my word for it- here are just the facts.

nordic model now

  “Evidence of SCARLET ALLIANCE’S opposition to Federal Government Policies to stem Human Trafficking

 

  1. Opposition to exit programs

Scarlet Alliance publicly opposes exit programs to support trafficked women wanting to leave the sex industry.[i]

  1. Denies the reality of human trafficking for sexual exploitation

Scarlet Alliance refuses to acknowledge that sex slavery exists and claims that leaving prostitution is an individual decision for which there should be no government intervention.[ii]Scarlet Alliance’s policy is to have “sex work” considered equivalent to any other professional occupation.

  1. Opposition to making debt bondage an offence

Scarlet Alliance is opposed to debt bondage being an offence under State Government crime legislation[iii]

  1. Opposition to any controls on prostitution
    Scarlet Alliance opposes all laws, regulations, rules or policies for the sex industry.Yet it asserts that the safety of “sex workers” should be prioritised over all industry or community concerns.[iv]
  1. Opposed to penalties for knowingly using trafficked women:

The Scarlet Alliance is opposed to criminalisation of intentionally, knowingly or recklessly obtaining sexual services from trafficked women.[v]

  1. Opposes penalties for brothel owners knowingly using trafficked women:

Scarlet Alliance has publicly declared its opposition to any form of sanction or penalty for brothel owners who knowingly engage and exploit trafficked persons.[vi]

  1. Opposes police checks on brothels

Scarlet Alliance has declared its opposition to giving Police  a more flexible
right of entry to legal or illegal brothels.[vii]

  1. Opposition to any kind of police involvement in policing of prostitution.

It believes that police should be removed from any administrative or regulatory role in the sex industry.  This belief makes mockery of the fact that Scarlet Alliance also claims that people “working” in the sex industry should be afforded police protection.[viii]

  1. Opposition to police giving trafficking a higher priority

Scarlet Alliance is opposed to police being trained to be more aware of the signs of human trafficking and giving it a higher priority.They are also opposed to increasing public awareness about sex trafficking and sexual slavery.[ix]

  1. Claims human trafficking is a myth

Scarlet Alliance claims that trafficking is a myth produced by media hype, anti-trafficking and anti-slavery organisations[x].    It believes that anti trafficking raids have forced “sex workers” “underground”.This position makes a mockery of the fact that Scarlet Alliance contributed to the development of the Guidelines for NGOs Working with Trafficked People.[xi]

  1. Opposition to provision of refuges for trafficked women

It beggars belief, but Scarlet Alliance is opposed to the establishment of appropriately funded refuges for trafficked women, and they oppose assistance and support being provided to victims of trafficking.[xii]

They oppose these services to victims lest attention be drawn to the evil of human trafficking which, in turn, would make it difficult to argue that “sex work” is the equivalent of any other professional occupation

  1. Opposition to public awareness programs for clients of prostitution:

Scarlet Alliance is opposed to any advertising that alerts purchasers (johns)and prospective purchasers (johns)of sexual service to the existence of the crime of sexual trafficking.[xiii]

It wants the public to remain in denial about the existence and magnitude of sex trafficking on the grounds that this would give a bad name to “sex work” in general.

  1. Opposition to anything that hinders the promotion of sex work

Anything that hinders the promotion of “sex work”.[xiv]

  1. Wants to promote sex work and 457 visas for sex work.

Scarlet Alliance wants to promote “sex work” as a legitimate occupation; it claims that “sex workers” should become entitled to 457 Visas and that brothel owners should be eligible sponsors of “migrant sex workers” (i.e trafficked women) to give more respectability to the pursuit of professional “sex work”.[xv]

Scarlet Alliance claims that “sex work” should be considered legitimate in all its forms, including brothel, private escort and street based work. No licensing model should apply.[xvi]

So this is for anyone still wondering why they oppose the Nordic Model, ( a model of legislation which decriminalises the prostituted and instead calls the men who buy and sell us the criminals.) For anyone still wondering if they have a point and if this is all about sex being taboo and “stigma” and blah, blah, blah. For anyone wondering if you yourself should  oppose a model which provides exiting strategies and funding for women trying to leave prostitution .You can have a think about their ethics, their chants of “sex worker rights!”, their actual misogyny parading as some personal, stigmatised oppression from “moralists” and  “rescuers”. You can have a think about how these ‘advocates’ who claim to be “run by sex workers, for sex workers”, even if they are in management positions and don’t have to sell sex at all ! treat women such as myself and so many others who actually give a shit about women.  Would you call a woman entered into prostitution as a child a “Migrant Sex Worker”?  And what would you give to know back then, when you were being “liberal” and “Choosy-Choice”, what you know right now?

They are calling for more funding . The Scarlet Alliance just received an extra of $960,000,(on top of the funding they have already received, which adds up to millions), for their place on a board to fight sex-trafficking.

Yes, you read that right. A group which denies sex-trafficking exists is on an advisory panel with the Abbott Government’s National Anti-Trafficking Plan.

Take a moment. I understand.

[i] Response to Victorian Recommendations into trafficking for sex work, Scarlet Alliance, 2010, http://www.scarletalliance.org.au/laws/vic/vicrecommendations_2010/

[ii] ibid, response to  recommendation 20

[iii] Ibid, response to recommendation 5

[iv]  Constitution, Scarlet Alliance, clause 3(c), updated November 2012

[v]Response to Victorian Recommendations, op cit, resp. to rec.6

[vi]  Ibid, resp. to rec.7

[vii]  Ibid, , resp. to rec.10

[viii]  Submission to WA Attorney General, Scarlet Alliance, January 27 2011

[ix] Response to Victorian Recommendations, op cit. , resp. to rec. 7,8 and 9

[x] Report to the UN General Assembly High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development, Scarlet Alliance 2013

[xi] 2010 Guidelines for NGOs working with Trafficked People, Commonwealth of Australia, 2010

[xii] Response to Victorian Recommendations, op.cit., resp. to rec. 22

[xiii]  Ibid, resp.to rec.14

[xiv]  Constitution op.cit.

[xv] Submission to 457 Visa Integrity Review Committee, Scarlet Alliance, April 30 2014

[xvi]  Ibid, also Submission to Attorney General, op cit.

http://www.ag.gov.au/CrimeAndCorruption/HumanTrafficking/Documents/Trafficking-NationalActionPlanToCombatHumanTraffickingAndSlavery2015-19.pdf

Advertisements

22 thoughts on “The Scarlet Alliance/Sex Worker Collective’s Misogyny. Why They Should Not Be funded.

  1. Please don’t call them “purchasers and prospective purchasers of sexual service” they are johns!

    1. I know. The policies I listed as evidence are their policies, I doubt very much they are going to stop using the terminology. And thanks for reblogging Black Metal Valkyrie.

      1. Oh okay, I thought that was your rewording. I understand. What a whitewashed, bullshit way to talk about commercial sexual violence.

  2. Abbott is a cocksucker. We have a shitty Tory gov in Canada as well, but at least we put through NM-inspired laws recently.

  3. “The Scarlet Alliance is opposed to criminalisation of intentionally, knowingly or recklessly obtaining sexual services from trafficked women.”

    You mean they are opposed to criminalisation of rape? Interesting, one should think that’d be already covered by existing laws? Why does it make a difference whether the rape victim was enslaved and imprisoned prior to the rape?

    Shocking.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s